¿Una Zeitenwende normativa? Contestación de normas y spillover asimétrico en el control de exportaciones de armamento en la Unión Europea
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este artículo analiza la evolución del régimen de control de exportaciones de armamento en la Unión Europea desde una perspectiva teórica. Argumenta que la creciente integración del mercado de defensa no ha generado una convergencia política equivalente, sino un proceso de spillover asimétrico caracterizado por resultados parciales y contingentes. A partir del concepto de contestación normativa y de la noción de hipocresía organizada, el trabajo sostiene que la ambigüedad del sistema constituye un equilibrio funcional entre normas en competencia. El artículo contribuye a repensar los límites del proceso de integración europea en ámbitos de alta sensibilidad soberana.
Enviado el 28 de abril de 2026; aceptado el 3 de junio de 2026
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalles del artículo
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Acharya, A. «After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order». International Affairs, 94 (1), 2018, pp. 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix249
Adler, E. & Barnett, M. (Eds.). Security communities. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Adler, E. & Pouliot, V. International practices. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Béraud-Sudreau, L. The extra-EU defence exports’ effects on European armaments cooperation. Directorate-General for External Policies, European Parliament, 2015.
Béraud-Sudreau, L.; Fuhrhop, P.; Maulny, J.-P. & Mölling, C. Russia’s war against Ukraine: A new impetus for the harmonisation of European arms export policies? ARES Policy Paper No. 83, 2023.
Bromley, M. «Norms and compliance in international arms transfer control: Assessing effectiveness». The Nonproliferation Review, 25 (5-6), 2018, pp. 443-460.
Bromley, M. «The European Union’s arms export control regime: A framework of competing norms». European Review of International Studies, 7 (2-3), 2020, pp. 214-235.
Bromley, M. «Arms export controls, industry, and Europeanization: Institutional evolution and policy practice». Contemporary Security Policy, 42 (4), 2021, pp. 493-515.
Bromley, M. Understanding European arms export controls: Material interests and competing norms. Stockholm University, 2022.
Calcara, A. European defence decision-making: Dilemmas of collaborative arms procurement. Routledge, 2020.
Council of the European Union. Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment. Official Journal of the European Union, 2008.
Council of the European Union. Council Decision (CFSP) 2025/779 amending Common Position 2008/944/CFSP. Official Journal of the European Union, 2025.
Cops, D. & Duquet, N. Reviewing the EU Common Position on arms exports: Whither EU arms transfer controls? Flemish Peace Institute, 2019.
Cops, D.; Duquet, N. & Gourdin, G. Towards Europeanised arms export controls? Comparing control systems in EU member states. Flemish Peace Institute, 2017.
Entrevista Anónima. Experto en seguridad y defensa europea. Bruselas. Entrevista realizada para esta investigación, 20 de noviembre de 2025.
European Commission. Proposal for a regulation establishing the European Defence Industry Programme [COM(2024) 150 final].
European Commission. Defence Readiness Omnibus [COM(2025) 820 final].
Finnemore, M. & Wendt, A. «When ‘old’ constructivism was new: Reflections on classical constructivism». Perspectives on Politics, 22 (4), 2024, pp. 1248-1268.
George, M.; Djokic, K.; Hussain, Z; Wezeman, P. D. & Wezeman, S. T. Trends in international arms transfers, 2025 (SIPRI Fact Sheet, March 2026). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2026.
Haas, E. B. Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. Edward Elgar (Original work published 1958), 2023.
Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. «Does efficiency shape the territorial structure of government?». Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 2009, pp. 225-241.
Hooghe, L.; Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. «Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?». Comparative Political Studies, 35 (8), 2002, pp. 965-989.
Hopf, T. «The logic of habit in international relations». European Journal of International Relations, 16 (4), 2010, pp. 539-561.
Krasner, S. D. Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press, 1999.
Leuffen, D.; Dimitrova, A. L.; Sedelmeier, U.; Lavenex, S.; Risse, T., & Schimmelfennig, F. «Rhetorical action in a liberal international order in crisis». Journal of European Public Policy, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2413461
Liang, X.; Tian, N.; Lopes da Silva, D.; Scarazzato, L.; Karim, Z. & Guiberteau Ricard, J. Trends in world military expenditure, 2025 (SIPRI Fact Sheet, April 2026). Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2026.
Mearsheimer, J. J. «Bound to fail: The rise and fall of the liberal international order». International Security, 43 (4), 2019, pp. 7-50.
Moravcsik, A. The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell University Press, 1998.
Moravcsik, A. «Preferences, power and institutions in 21st-century Europe». Journal of Common Market Studies, 56 (7), 2018, pp. 1648-1674.
Orchard, P. & Wiener, A. «Norms and norm contestation». In: P. A. Mello & F. Ostermann. Routledge handbook of foreign policy analysis methods. Routledge, 2023, pp. 51-66.
Schimmelfennig, F. The EU, NATO and the integration of Europe: Rules and rhetoric. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Waltz, K. N. Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Yan, X. Leadership and the rise of great powers: Moral realism in international relations. Princeton University Press, 2019.